As 2024 comes to a close, the Russia-Ukraine war remains the central geopolitical conflict, reshaping alliances, global energy flows, and the balance of power. The war, now in its third year, has revealed the strategic hypocrisy of nations that prioritize self-interest over international law, aligning themselves with Russia while fueling instability worldwide.
Russia-Ukraine: A Conflict That Divides the World
The war has entered a critical phase, with Russia intensifying attacks on Ukrainian infrastructure and civilian areas, while Ukraine continues its counteroffensives in the east and south. Despite heavy international sanctions, Russia's economy remains resilient, primarily due to support from countries willing to bypass global norms for political and economic gain.
Iran and North Korea: These nations have emerged as Russia’s most committed enablers:
- Iran supplies advanced drones and missile systems, which Russia uses to target Ukrainian cities. Iranian Shahed drones have been central to Moscow’s relentless attacks, exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine.
- North Korea has reportedly provided artillery shells and ammunition, defying UN sanctions and further isolating itself from the international community.
“This is a dangerous precedent,” notes defense analyst Mark Phelps. “It emboldens rogue states to use war as leverage in global diplomacy.”
African Nations and Russian Influence: Some African countries, particularly those struggling with internal conflicts and economic instability, have publicly aligned with Russia to secure economic aid, military support, or diplomatic backing.
- The Wagner Group, a Russian private military organization, has increased its presence in Africa, securing lucrative mining contracts in exchange for military protection, notably in Mali and the Central African Republic.
- In return, these governments support Russia in global forums like the UN, refusing to condemn its aggression in Ukraine.
The Western Response:
The U.S., EU, and NATO continue to provide military and financial support to Ukraine, yet divisions are becoming evident. Some EU nations, facing economic strain and war fatigue, are pushing for negotiated solutions, which Kyiv argues would reward Russian aggression.- Impact: The war has forced NATO to strengthen its eastern flank while encouraging Sweden and Finland to abandon decades of neutrality and join the alliance.
Global Impact: Energy, Trade, and Security
Energy Markets:
The war has disrupted global energy supplies, with Russia rerouting oil exports to countries like China and India at discounted rates. This has undermined Western sanctions and allowed Russia to maintain its war economy.- Meanwhile, European nations have scrambled to diversify energy sources, leading to increased investments in renewables but also temporary reliance on LNG imports from the U.S. and Qatar.
Food Crisis:
Russia’s blockade of Ukrainian grain exports earlier in the year exacerbated food shortages across Africa and parts of the Middle East. Despite international mediation, ongoing attacks on Ukraine’s Black Sea ports threaten global food security.Military and Technological Race:
The war has accelerated global military spending. Nations are now prioritizing defense technologies, including drone warfare, AI-based surveillance, and missile systems. Countries like Iran and North Korea are leveraging this conflict to test and showcase their capabilities on a broader scale.
The Hypocrisy of Global Alignments
The Russia-Ukraine war highlights the double standards of certain nations that advocate for sovereignty and peace while actively supporting or enabling Russian aggression:
- Iran and North Korea leverage the conflict to defy international sanctions and build military partnerships with Russia.
- China maintains a delicate balance: while not openly supporting Russia militarily, Beijing benefits from discounted Russian energy and increased geopolitical leverage.
- African nations aligned with Russia are often driven by economic desperation rather than ideological alignment. Yet, their silence on Ukraine’s suffering undermines collective efforts to uphold international law.
“This war has revealed a harsh truth,” says geopolitical expert Maria Velasquez. “Principles are often traded for profit, resources, or political survival.”
Conclusion: A Fractured Global Order
As December 18, 2024, approaches, the Russia-Ukraine conflict remains a symbol of a fractured world order. While Western nations rally behind Ukraine, other states continue to pursue self-serving alliances with Russia, eroding global unity.
The consequences are clear: a divided world facing greater instability, economic fragmentation, and military escalation. Without stronger international pressure and accountability, the war risks becoming a template for future conflicts, where power trumps principles, and sovereignty is up for negotiation.
“History will judge not just the aggressor but also those who enabled aggression,” concludes historian Peter Clarke.
Author Andrew Azarov, professor of the IBA Consortium (United Kingdom).
Stay informed with the latest developments on 100news.tv.