GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT ALLIANCE (Only for Leaders)

Monday, 1 September 2025

Thirty Years of Resonance: Revisiting Beijing '95 and Hillary Clinton's Defining Speech "Human rights are women’s rights"

This September 4th marks a pivotal moment in the history of the global fight for gender equality: the 30th anniversary of the opening of the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing. Convened under the theme “Action for Equality, Development and Peace,” the two-week gathering in 1995 was more than a diplomatic meeting; it was a watershed that redefined the scope of women's rights as fundamental human rights and provided a revolutionary blueprint for progress. At its heart was a speech by then-U.S. First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, an address so powerful and unyielding that it echoed across the world, challenging entrenched power structures and giving a bold, new voice to a global movement.

The Stage: A World Gathering in Beijing

The Beijing Conference was unprecedented in its scale and ambition. It brought together 17,000 participants, including delegates from 189 governments, and an additional 30,000 activists who attended a parallel NGO Forum. The goal was to assess the progress since the previous women's conference in Nairobi (1985) and to adopt a new set of commitments.

The context was a world rapidly changing after the Cold War, yet one where discrimination and violence against women remained pervasive and often legally enshrined. The conference aimed to shift the conversation from theoretical discussions to concrete, actionable policies. After intense negotiations, the crowning achievement of the diplomatic effort was the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, a comprehensive document that outlined 12 critical areas of concern—from women and poverty to education and training, violence against women, and the girl-child. It was, and remains, the most progressive blueprint for advancing women's rights globally.

"Women's Rights Are Human Rights": The Speech That Changed the Conversation

While the Platform for Action was a collective achievement, it was Hillary Clinton’s speech on September 5, 1995, that captured the world’s attention and became the conference's defining soundbite. Defying internal pressure to deliver a softer, more diplomatic message, Clinton chose instead to deliver a direct and uncompromising challenge.

Her now-immortalised declaration—“Human rights are women’s rights, and women’s rights are human rights, once and for all”—was not merely a catchy phrase. It was a radical philosophical and political reframing. For decades, issues like domestic violence, sexual assault, unequal pay, and reproductive healthcare had been dismissed as “soft” social or cultural issues, relegated to the sidelines of the “serious” human rights discourse focused on political prisoners and freedom of speech. Clinton forcefully dragged them into the centre, arguing that the abuse of women in their homes and the denial of education to girls were just as grave violations of human dignity as any other injustice.

She boldly named the problems often shrouded in silence: “It is a violation of human rights when babies are denied food, or drowned, or suffocated, or their spines broken, simply because they are born girls,” she stated. “It is a violation of human rights when women and girls are sold into the slavery of prostitution... when women are doused with gasoline, set on fire, and burned to death because their marriage dowries are deemed too small.”

The speech was a direct rebuke to cultural relativism—the argument that certain rights could be ignored due to traditional practices. She confronted this head-on, saying, “Freedom to be a full and equal participant in the family, in the workplace, and in the community is not a Western value; it is a universal value that resonates across cultures and continents.”

The impact was electric. The hall erupted in applause, a moment of pure catharsis for the thousands of activists and delegates who had fought for this recognition their entire lives. The speech provided a clear, powerful mantra for the global movement, a tool for advocacy that was simple to understand and impossible to ignore.

The Legacy: A Precursor to Feminist Foreign Policy

The Beijing Platform for Action, amplified by Clinton’s clarion call, did not just produce documents for a UN archive. It created a tangible and enduring legacy:

A Global Framework for Accountability: For three decades, the Platform has served as a gold standard against which nations are measured. Governments, NGOs, and UN bodies like UN Women use it to track progress, expose shortcomings, and advocate for new laws and policies.

Empowerment of Civil Society: The conference and the speech supercharged the global women's movement. It connected activists across borders, providing them with a shared language and a formalized set of demands to leverage against their own governments.

The Foundation for Feminist Foreign Policy: Most significantly, the Beijing Conference is widely recognized as the intellectual and political precursor to the modern concept of "feminist foreign policy." This approach, now adopted by several nations including Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico, argues that a country’s external actions should systematically prioritize gender equality, the rights of women and girls, and the representation of women in peace and security processes.

The core principle of feminist foreign policy—that sustainable peace, development, and security are impossible without the full participation of women—is a direct extension of the arguments solidified in Beijing. Clinton’s speech laid the groundwork by insisting that the status of women is not a niche issue but a central barometer of a society’s health and stability, and therefore a core subject of international relations.

Thirty Years On: The Unfinished Journey

Three decades later, the resonance of Beijing is a mix of celebration and sober reckoning. Tremendous progress has been made: more girls are in school, maternal mortality has fallen, and laws protecting women from violence have been passed in numerous countries.

Yet, the Platform's vision remains unfinished. Backlash against gender equality, rising authoritarianism, the climate crisis, and the digital gender gap present new and complex challenges. The anniversary is not just a commemoration but a urgent call to action—a reminder of the bold ambition of 1995 and the work that remains to realize it.

The words spoken in Beijing retain their power because the fight is not over. Hillary Clinton’s speech was a hinge of history, swinging the door open to a broader, more inclusive understanding of human rights. As the world looks back on that September day thirty years ago, it is reminded that some truths, once spoken aloud, cannot be silenced, and that the pursuit of equality, development, and peace is a journey that requires relentless, generation-spanning action.

Russia-Ukraine War and trade wars at the SCO Summit 2025

The leaders of China and India say there is now deepening trust between them after years of tension that includes a long-running border dispute.

China's President Xi Jinping and Indian PM Narendra Modi met on the sidelines of the Shanghai Co-operation Organisation (SCO) in the port city of Tianjin. It is Modi's first time in China in seven years.

Xi told Modi that China and India should be partners, not rivals, while Modi said there was now an "atmosphere of peace and stability" between them.

Russian President Vladimir Putin is also at the summit, attended by more than 20 world leaders, which this year has been overshadowed by trade wars with the US.

US President Donald Trump has imposed steep tariffs on Indian goods as punishment for Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, and Putin faces threats of sanctions for his ongoing war on Ukraine.

As the US-India relationship faces increasing headwinds, Modi is moving closer to Xi. Both countries are not only the most populous, but also have two of the largest economies in the world.

Modi announced that flights between India and China - suspended since deadly troop clashes on their shared Himalayan border in 2020 - would resume, without providing a timeline.

Xi said "both sides need to approach and handle our relationship from a strategic height and long-term perspective" and that "it is the right choice for both sides to be friends".

The SCO summit itself is largely symbolic but will allow leaders to air common grievances and shared interests. It comes days before a massive military parade in Beijing that will mark 80 years since the end of World War Two.

There are 10 member states in the grouping - including Russia, Pakistan and Iran - and 16 dialogue partners and observers.

Putin, who is a close ally of China, arrived to a red carpet welcome in Tianjin on Sunday.

The SCO was created by China, Russia and four Central Asian countries in 2001 as a countermeasure to limit the influence of Western alliances such as Nato.

This year's gathering is the largest since it was founded.

For Tianjin, the summit has become a major event, with banners and billboards promoting it throughout the northern port city.

At night, tens of thousands of local spectators have been cramming into the riverside area to see a lightshow displayed on tower blocks while the gathering is taking place.

The streets have been heavily crowded - making it difficult for people to even move, especially on and around the historic Jiefang Bridge.

During the day, pedestrians are at times being made to wait as roadblocks go up to allow the motorcades of visiting world leaders to pass by quickly.

Taxis and other hire car services have been suspended in the downtown area, but this has not dampened the enthusiasm of crowds of people wanting to be part of what has been described as a historic meeting.

However, police have advised Tianjin's more than 13 million residents to avoid moving around the city if possible and to stick to shops nearby them to purchase any immediate necessities.

Source: BBC News

Saturday, 30 August 2025

“Education is not only about knowledge, but about creating strong personalities” — Dr. Olga Azarova

Trend: Shift from knowledge-based learning to competency-based learning.

International Education Network MINIBOSS BUSINESS SCHOOL is the world’s № 1 brand in business education for kids and teens. For more than two decades, it has pioneered a new educational model that develops entrepreneurial, emotional, creative, and leadership skills in children aged 6–17, preparing them for success in the global economy.

“Education is not only about knowledge; it is about creating strong personalities who can lead, innovate, and transform society.”Olga Azarova, Founder of MINIBOSS Business School


Curriculum Design: From Knowledge to Competence

Unlike traditional schooling, the MINIBOSS Curriculum is intentionally designed to balance theoretical learning with practical application. A curriculum map outlines a year-long scope and sequence, ensuring both structure and incremental personality development.

Azarova emphasises:

“Intentional design must always come before systematic documentation. First, we build a model that works for the child’s full potential — only then do we formalise it.”



Main Problems of General Education and How MINIBOSS Provides Solutions

1. Outdated Knowledge, Irrelevant to Real Life

  • Mass Education Today: Reliance on memorisation and obsolete theory.
  • Parent Demand: Future-oriented skills: financial literacy, entrepreneurship, creativity.
  • MINIBOSS Solution: Curriculum based on 8Qs; courses in entrepreneurship, finance, leadership, innovation, and AI; real startup creation and market testing.

2. Lack of Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence

  • Mass Education Today: Focus only on IQ.
  • Parent Demand: Development of EQ, teamwork, leadership, and communication.
  • MINIBOSS Solution: Team projects, startup creation, public speaking at Startup Forums, and emotional intelligence training.

3. Absence of Entrepreneurial Thinking & Financial Education

  • Mass Education Today: Students leave school without financial literacy or entrepreneurial mindset.
  • Parent Demand: Financial and business literacy from early age.
  • MINIBOSS Solution: Financial literacy from age 6; training in money management, investment, and startup acceleration.

4. Passive Learning, No Engagement

  • Mass Education Today: Teacher-centred lectures dominate.
  • Parent Demand: Active, project-based learning.
  • MINIBOSS Solution: Special teacher trainings, faculty development, simulations, role-plays, gamification, and experiential learning through startup building.

5. No Global Networking or Cross-Cultural Competence

  • Mass Education Today: Localised, limited exposure to global perspectives.
  • Parent Demand: Global readiness.
  • MINIBOSS Solution: International networking via Startup World Cup Championship and Global Business Week, fostering cross-cultural communication.

6. Lack of Career Connection

Mass Education Today: Students graduate unprepared for professional life.
Parent Demand: Early career guidance, mentorship, and real experience.
MINIBOSS Solution: Startup Incubator, mentorship, career orientation embedded in every programme, and real-world project portfolios.
The Global Demand for Reform

The 21st century requires education that is:

  • Competency-based, not knowledge-based
  • Entrepreneurial and future-oriented
  • Global and personalised
  • Focused on creativity, technology, and emotional skills

As Azarova states:

“The biggest challenge of modern education is its inertia. The world is moving fast, but schools remain in the 19th century. MINIBOSS is the answer — it brings education into the future.”


How MINIBOSS Leads the Reform

MINIBOSS Business School is not just a school — it is an academic model for a new generation of learners. It transforms education from memorisation to innovation, entrepreneurship, and leadership development.

Its graduates are not only knowledgeable but also capable: capable of leading projects, creating companies, solving problems, and thriving in any context.

“Our mission is to create a new elite — successful and happy people who will shape the economy and society of tomorrow.”Olga Azarova


MINIBOSS BUSINESS SCHOOL: The World’s №1 Academic Model for Kids and Teens.
Turning education into entrepreneurship, leadership, and global impact.

If you would like to join, go to: https://franch.miniboss-school.biz

Sunday, 17 August 2025

Jessica Berlin: Stop Being Shocked by Trump. Start Stopping Russia.

Jessica Berlin: "Trump’s incompetence on Russia is matched only by Europe’s incompetence on Trump".

It’s been over ten years since Donald Trump descended a golden escalator to announce his candidacy for U.S. president. Europe has been clutching its collective pearls over how to deal with him ever since.

In that time, we have had an entire four-year term to observe his incompetence, egomania, and erratic behavior; a four-year Biden breather during which we were warned of and could have prepared for Trump’s return; and now, more than half a year into his second term, clear evidence that he is just as vindictive and incompetent as he seemed on the campaign trail. Yet European leaders still act surprised when he does something reckless or dangerous – like, say, invite Vladimir Putin to a bilateral summit in Alaska.

For over a decade, European leaders have been caught in a reactive loop: shocked when Trump behaves exactly as he always does, relieved when he momentarily pivots, paralysed when he inevitably reverts. This is not grand strategy, it’s political whiplash.

The cycle is predictable: Trump makes a destabilising move that helps Russia or harms Ukraine, like siding with Vladimir Putin over US intelligence on election interference in Helsinki in 2018, or berating President Zelenskyy in the Oval Office this February. European leaders react with shock. Later Trump pulls a 180 and does something we want, like approving new Patriot missile systems for Ukraine last month, and they breathe a sigh of relief. Then he swings back again, as now with the Alaska summit. Europe freaked out, again, then was somewhat relieved, again, when Trump agreed not to offer Ukrainian territory to Russia during the virtual summit on Wednesday. The merry-go-round spins on.

This pattern, and Trump’s sympathy for autocrats, aren’t new. During his first term, Trump froze military aid to Ukraine in 2019 while pressing Zelenskyy to open an investigation into Hunter Biden. He has repeatedly praised autocrats, calling Kim Jong Un “a pretty smart cookie,” ” Xi Jinping “a terrific guy,” and just today called Belarusian dictator Lukashenko “highly respected.” At the same time, he repeatedly attacks democratic allies as “delinquent” and “unfair,” and has threatened to pull the US out of NATO.

Trump obviously cannot be relied upon to defend European interests, democratic values, or even territorial security. He is on no one’s side but his own. Yet Europe continues to let his whims dictate our strategy (or lack thereof).

The Alaska summit is simply the latest example. Whether it ends in a debacle of American concessions to Russia or ends up ‘just’ being a diplomatic disgrace with no policy output, we can’t count on its results to last a month. As the new acronym circulating in Washington puts it, TACO: Trump Always Chickens Out. He always breaks his word. His one consistent trait is inconsistency. For Europe to base its strategy on the US is like building a bridge on quicksand and then acting surprised when it sinks.

Europe’s strategy to defeat Russia in Ukraine must be European. We must stop using Trump’s outrages as an excuse for not acting ourselves. The means to secure Ukraine’s victory and dismantle Russia’s war machine already exist within Europe’s collective power. Europe can and should:
  • Increase and enforce sanctions to tank Russia’s economic war machine. That means ending all Russian energy and commodity imports, closing loopholes, shutting down Russia’s shadow fleet, and imposing secondary sanctions on those who help Moscow circumvent restrictions.
  • Seize Russian assets – both state funds and Kremlin-linked private wealth parked in European banks – and transfer them to Ukraine for reconstruction and defense financing.
  • Deny all non-asylum visas to Russian citizens, signalling that there is no business as usual while the war continues.
  • Scale up military aid without delay, delivering promised weapons and ammunition on schedule.
  • Support Ukrainian air defence through the Sky Shield initiative to protect Ukrainian cities and infrastructure.
  • Increase long-term financial support through EU institutions to guarantee Ukraine’s economic survival through the war and beyond.
These are policy options entirely within Europe’s reach. Choosing not to act is still an active choice.

After more than ten years of Trump and 3.5 years of full-scale war in Ukraine, Europeans have no one to blame but themselves for lacking a strategy to deal with Trump and Putin. No matter what happens in Alaska today, the United States and Russia bear full responsibility for their actions. Europe bears equal responsibility for its own inaction.